Entity page · built from email

Intratex

Litigation / dispute party

Assembled from 33 messages that mention Intratex across eight Enron mailboxes, Sep 1999 – Nov 2001. Every line below was read out of correspondence, and every line opens the message it came from.

Wholly-owned Enron gas subsidiary kept undissolved because it was a litigant, defending the Beeson ratability case and later the RSM Zapata County undermeasurement suit.

What the brain knew on
Jul 1999Jul 2000Jul 2001Jun 2002

Drag it, or use the arrow keys for one step at a time and Home and End for the ends. Durable facts accumulate; the ones that were only true for a while appear, then expire with a reason attached. The relationship itself changes 2 times.

What we know

The consolidated view, as it stood on the selected date.

Contents

Sections in the order they mattered to the company. The counts follow the date you have selected.

Two kinds of fact

A brain that only keeps what is permanently true is a reference book, and it would have been no use to anyone at Enron in November 2001. A brain that keeps everything is the inbox again. The distinction that matters is not true versus false. It is durable versus current. A current fact carries what would end it. Sometimes the message gives a date and the page shows it; more often it gives only the condition, and the page says that instead of inventing a date the mail never stated.

33messages across eight mailboxes name it
33of those are cited as a source somewhere on this page
40facts still worth knowing to someone who was not there
26were worth knowing at one point, and the brain records what makes them expire