Entity page · built from email

Mitsubishi

Litigation / dispute party

Assembled from 71 messages that mention Mitsubishi across eight Enron mailboxes, Oct 1999 – Nov 2001. Every line below was read out of correspondence, and every line opens the message it came from.

Japanese ship charterer and turbine maker that was Enron's trading counterparty, turbine supplier and, after the Pacific Virgo cargo contamination, its arbitration opponent.

What the brain knew on
Jul 1999Jul 2000Jul 2001Jun 2002

Drag it, or use the arrow keys for one step at a time and Home and End for the ends. Durable facts accumulate; the ones that were only true for a while appear, then expire with a reason attached. The relationship itself changes 3 times.

What we know

The consolidated view, as it stood on the selected date.

Contents

Sections in the order they mattered to the company. The counts follow the date you have selected.

Two kinds of fact

A brain that only keeps what is permanently true is a reference book, and it would have been no use to anyone at Enron in November 2001. A brain that keeps everything is the inbox again. The distinction that matters is not true versus false. It is durable versus current. A current fact carries what would end it. Sometimes the message gives a date and the page shows it; more often it gives only the condition, and the page says that instead of inventing a date the mail never stated.

71messages across eight mailboxes name it
68of those are cited as a source somewhere on this page
49facts still worth knowing to someone who was not there
66were worth knowing at one point, and the brain records what makes them expire