Entity page · built from email

The New York Times

Media / analysts

Assembled from 195 messages that mention The New York Times across eight Enron mailboxes, Nov 1999 – Feb 2002. Every line below was read out of correspondence, and every line opens the message it came from.

Derivatives counterparty and newspaper Enron subscribed to and rebutted, whose 2001 investigations of Enron's Washington influence and California role preceded detailed coverage of its accounting and collapse.

What the brain knew on
Jul 1999Jul 2000Jul 2001Jun 2002

Drag it, or use the arrow keys for one step at a time and Home and End for the ends. Durable facts accumulate; the ones that were only true for a while appear, then expire with a reason attached. The relationship itself changes 3 times.

What we know

The consolidated view, as it stood on the selected date.

Contents

Sections in the order they mattered to the company. The counts follow the date you have selected.

Two kinds of fact

A brain that only keeps what is permanently true is a reference book, and it would have been no use to anyone at Enron in November 2001. A brain that keeps everything is the inbox again. The distinction that matters is not true versus false. It is durable versus current. A current fact carries what would end it. Sometimes the message gives a date and the page shows it; more often it gives only the condition, and the page says that instead of inventing a date the mail never stated.

195messages across eight mailboxes name it
199of those are cited as a source somewhere on this page
297facts still worth knowing to someone who was not there
23were worth knowing at one point, and the brain records what makes them expire