Entity page · built from email

The Washington Post

Media / analysts

Assembled from 46 messages that mention The Washington Post across eight Enron mailboxes, May 2000 – Dec 2001. Every line below was read out of correspondence, and every line opens the message it came from.

Newspaper whose political and climate coverage Enron circulated internally, which reported Enron's lobbying and power-trader fights in August 2001, then its SEC probe, restatement and Dynegy deal.

What the brain knew on
Jul 1999Jul 2000Jul 2001Jun 2002

Drag it, or use the arrow keys for one step at a time and Home and End for the ends. Durable facts accumulate; the ones that were only true for a while appear, then expire with a reason attached. The relationship itself changes 2 times.

What we know

The consolidated view, as it stood on the selected date.

Contents

Sections in the order they mattered to the company. The counts follow the date you have selected.

Two kinds of fact

A brain that only keeps what is permanently true is a reference book, and it would have been no use to anyone at Enron in November 2001. A brain that keeps everything is the inbox again. The distinction that matters is not true versus false. It is durable versus current. A current fact carries what would end it. Sometimes the message gives a date and the page shows it; more often it gives only the condition, and the page says that instead of inventing a date the mail never stated.

46messages across eight mailboxes name it
39of those are cited as a source somewhere on this page
55facts still worth knowing to someone who was not there
2were worth knowing at one point, and the brain records what makes them expire