this+that vs Slite
Both want a company brain you can trust. Slite starts from the docs.
Slite is a knowledge base whose agent checks your docs against activity in tools like Slack, Linear and HubSpot, and proposes fixes for a person to approve. this+that reads Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Chat as messages arrive, turns what they ask for into tasks and workflows, and keeps what the company learns in a brain every workflow reads and writes. If you need a wiki your team trusts, start with Slite. If the work and the changes arrive in messages, that's what we built.
A knowledge base that stays accurate, or a brain fed by the work
Slite started as a team knowledge base ten years ago, according to its CEO, and says more than 1,700 companies use it. Its pitch today is "verified knowledge, kept in sync with reality." The Slite Agent syncs from tools such as Slack, Linear, GitHub, Google Drive, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira and Zendesk, notices where a doc no longer matches what is happening, and drafts an update as a side-by-side diff that a person approves. Pages have owners, verification tags and expiry dates, and answers come with citations in the app, through an API and over MCP.
If the problem is a wiki nobody trusts, Slite is built for exactly that. Its editor, verification workflow and review queue are the product, and it goes much further on documents than we do.
this+that starts from the message rather than the document. Every message in every connected channel is read as it arrives, including mail from customers, suppliers and partners outside the company. DoBox turns requests and commitments into tasks visible to everyone who needs to see them, Contacts keeps itself current from those messages, and workflows act on all of it, writing back to the brain as they run, with a person approving changes where you want one.
Feature by feature
How the two products compare across the things that matter most.
| Topic | Slite | this+that |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Teams that want one trusted knowledge base, kept accurate as the company changes. | Teams whose work and changes arrive in messages and need to be recorded and acted on. |
| What sits at the center | Documents. The Slite Agent keeps them true; the docs stay the store. | The message stream. DoBox, Contacts and the brain each fill from it, and workflows act on all three. |
| What it reads | Connected tools including Slack, Linear, GitHub, Google Drive, Notion, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Confluence, SharePoint, Asana, Intercom, Attio, Zendesk and Zoom. Gmail, Outlook, Microsoft Teams, and Google Chat are not listed on their site. | Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Chat, read as one stream as each message arrives, plus Google and Outlook calendars. |
| Keeping knowledge current | Auto-maintenance fact-checks docs against your connected tools and shows suggested fixes in a triage view for a person to accept. | Workflows write back to the brain as they run, with a person approving or editing updates, and contacts keep themselves current from your messages. We're building toward the whole brain doing the same. |
| Tasks | Nothing on Slite’s site describes task management. | DoBox pulls requests, commitments, deadlines and follow-ups out of every connected channel and assigns them across the team with priorities, due dates and comments. |
| Automation | Agent workflows that maintain and answer from the knowledge base. | Workflows described in plain language, with conditional logic, AI decisions mid-run and sub-agents, triggered by arriving messages, schedules, new tasks or new contacts. |
| Documents and editing | A full knowledge base: real-time editor, verification tags, owners, expiry windows, public docs on a custom domain. | Editable brain pages in personal, team and public spaces, with version history. A simpler editor than Slite’s. |
| Answers and MCP | Cited answers in the app and API, and an MCP server other agents can use. | The assistant answers from the brain and your messages, and workflows reach other tools through built-in and remote MCP connections. |
| Security and compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, data hosted in the EU (Belgium), HIPAA on Enterprise. Customer data is not used to train external models. | SOC 2 Type I as of July 31, 2026, and CASA Tier 2, with Type II underway. |
| Pricing | Per user per month, billed yearly: Basic $10, Pro $20, which adds the Slite Agent, and custom Enterprise pricing. 14-day free trial. | Free for 30 days, including 3,000 credits, no credit card required. Then $35 per user per month, or $29 billed annually, with 3,000 credits a month per person. |
- Documents. A mature editor with verification tags, owners and expiry dates on every page.
- A review queue that checks existing docs against your tools and shows each suggested fix as a diff.
- Ten years of building a knowledge base, and more than 1,700 companies using it.
- SOC 2 Type II, EU hosting and HIPAA on Enterprise.
- A lower entry price for a knowledge base on its own.
- Every channel the company runs on: Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Chat, read as one stream, including mail from outside the company.
- Starts from each message as it arrives, email included, rather than from the docs.
- DoBox: work pulled out of any message, made visible to everyone who needs it, and tracked to done.
- Contacts that build themselves from the accounts you already connected, with each person's history attached.
- Workflows that act on what arrives, from routing an invoice to updating HubSpot, and write back to the brain as they run.
- A unified inbox where you read and reply across every connected channel.
What is Slite?
Slite is an AI knowledge base. Its Slite Agent syncs with tools such as Slack, Linear, GitHub and HubSpot, checks your docs against what is happening in them, and proposes updates for a person to approve. It answers questions with citations in the app, through an API and over MCP.
How much does Slite cost?
Slite's Basic plan is $10 per user per month and Pro, which includes the Slite Agent, is $20, both billed yearly, with custom Enterprise pricing and a 14-day free trial. this+that is free for 30 days, then priced per user.
Should we choose Slite or this+that?
If the job is a knowledge base your team trusts, with docs kept accurate and reviewed, choose Slite. If the problem is that requests, commitments and changes arrive in email and chat and never get recorded or acted on, choose this+that. A company can run both: Slite for the documentation, this+that for what arrives in messages.
See what's waiting in your channels
Connect your mail and your chat tools and this+that starts reading them. The requests, follow-ups and open commitments sitting in your messages become tracked work, and your workflows write what they learn back to the brain.
Free for 30 days · No credit card required · Then $35 per user per month · $29 billed annually